|
An evaluation of the use of smartphones to communicate between clinicians: a mixed-methods study
Robert Wu1,2, MD FRCPC MSc; Peter Rossos3, MD FRCPC MBA; Sherman Quan2, BSC; Scott Reeves4,5,6,7, PhD; Vivian Lo2, MASc; Brian Wong8, MD FRCPC; Mark Cheung8, MD FRCPC; Dante Morra1,2,9, MD FRCPC MBA
1University Health Network, Division of General Internal Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada 2Centre for Innovation in Complex Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada 3University Health Network, Department of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada 4Centre for Faculty Development, Li Ka Shing International Health Care Education Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada 5Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada 6Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada 7Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 8Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada 9Centre for Interprofessional Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Corresponding Author: Robert Wu, MD FRCPC MSc
University Health Network Division of General Internal Medicine 200 Elizabeth Street 14EN-222 Toronto, ON, M5G 2C4 Canada Phone: 1 416 340 4567 Fax: 1 416 595 5826 Email: robert.wu [at] uhn.on.ca
ABSTRACT
Background: Communication between clinicians is critical to providing quality patient care but is often hampered by limitations of current systems. Smartphones such as BlackBerrys may improve communication, but studies of these technologies have been limited to date. Objective: Our objectives were to describe how smartphones were adopted for clinical communication within general internal medical wards and determine their impact on team effectiveness and communication. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study that gathered data from the frequency of smartphone calls and email messages, clinicians' interviews, and ethnographic observations of clinical communication interactions. Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data was undertaken to develop common themes that encompass comprehensive and representative insights across different methods. Results: Findings from our study indicated that over a 24-hour period, nurses sent on average 22.3 emails to the physicians mostly through the “team smartphone,” the designated primary point of contact for a specific medical team. Physicians carrying the team smartphone received on average 21.9 emails and 6.4 telephone calls while sending out 6.9 emails and initiating 8.3 telephone calls over the 24-hour period. Our analyses identified both positive and negative outcomes associated with the use of smartphones for clinical communication. There was a perceived improvement in efficiency over the use of pagers for clinical communication for physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. In particular, residents found that the use of smartphones helped to increase their mobility and multitasking abilities. Negative outcomes included frequent interruptions and discordance between what doctors and nurses considered urgent. Nurses perceived a worsening of the interprofessional relationships due to overreliance on messaging by text with a resulting decrease in verbal communication. Unprofessional behaviors were observed in the use of smartphones by residents. Conclusions: Routine adoption of smartphones by residents appeared to improve efficiency over the use of pagers for physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals. This was balanced by negative communication issues of increased interruptions, a gap in perceived urgency, weakened interprofessional relationships, and unprofessional behavior. Further communication interventions are required that balance efficiency and interruptions while maintaining or even improving interprofessional relationships and professionalism.
(J Med Internet Res 2011;13(3):e59)
TEXTO COMPLETO DISPONIBLE AQUÍ
|